ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Occasional Call failure report from Vitelity on Hosted PBX

    IT Discussion
    pbx vitelity hosted rackspace
    5
    26
    7.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • FiyaFlyF
      FiyaFly
      last edited by

      Here's an interesting one. Every now and again a client sends us an email from Vitelity detailing a call failure. It only ever is one at a time and happens once every couple weeks. Nothing changes in the configuration. This is how the email reads:

      "A call to your DID <removed> from <removed> has failed at 11:02am on 11/05/2014 MDT. We received 'CHANUNAVAIL' when attempting to route the call to your server or device. This number is configured to route to the peer<removed> on the account <removed>

      This error usually means your server or device is not currently registered to our servers. Please make sure you are registered to the correct inbound server for your account as per the configuration samples found on the support page within the user portal and that you have selected the correct routing method for your DID(s) on the DIDs page.
      "

      Any ideas?

      thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • thanksajdotcomT
        thanksajdotcom @FiyaFly
        last edited by

        @FiyaFly said:

        Here's an interesting one. Every now and again a client sends us an email from Vitelity detailing a call failure. It only ever is one at a time and happens once every couple weeks. Nothing changes in the configuration. This is how the email reads:

        "A call to your DID <removed> from <removed> has failed at 11:02am on 11/05/2014 MDT. We received 'CHANUNAVAIL' when attempting to route the call to your server or device. This number is configured to route to the peer<removed> on the account <removed>

        This error usually means your server or device is not currently registered to our servers. Please make sure you are registered to the correct inbound server for your account as per the configuration samples found on the support page within the user portal and that you have selected the correct routing method for your DID(s) on the DIDs page.
        "

        Any ideas?

        Is the client in Mountain time?

        FiyaFlyF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • FiyaFlyF
          FiyaFly @thanksajdotcom
          last edited by

          @thanksaj said:

          @FiyaFly said:

          Here's an interesting one. Every now and again a client sends us an email from Vitelity detailing a call failure. It only ever is one at a time and happens once every couple weeks. Nothing changes in the configuration. This is how the email reads:

          "A call to your DID <removed> from <removed> has failed at 11:02am on 11/05/2014 MDT. We received 'CHANUNAVAIL' when attempting to route the call to your server or device. This number is configured to route to the peer<removed> on the account <removed>

          This error usually means your server or device is not currently registered to our servers. Please make sure you are registered to the correct inbound server for your account as per the configuration samples found on the support page within the user portal and that you have selected the correct routing method for your DID(s) on the DIDs page.
          "

          Any ideas?

          Is the client in Mountain time?

          The PBX is hosted. DFW data center.

          thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • thanksajdotcomT
            thanksajdotcom @FiyaFly
            last edited by

            @FiyaFly said:

            @thanksaj said:

            @FiyaFly said:

            Here's an interesting one. Every now and again a client sends us an email from Vitelity detailing a call failure. It only ever is one at a time and happens once every couple weeks. Nothing changes in the configuration. This is how the email reads:

            "A call to your DID <removed> from <removed> has failed at 11:02am on 11/05/2014 MDT. We received 'CHANUNAVAIL' when attempting to route the call to your server or device. This number is configured to route to the peer<removed> on the account <removed>

            This error usually means your server or device is not currently registered to our servers. Please make sure you are registered to the correct inbound server for your account as per the configuration samples found on the support page within the user portal and that you have selected the correct routing method for your DID(s) on the DIDs page.
            "

            Any ideas?

            Is the client in Mountain time?

            The PBX is hosted. DFW data center.

            Why is the time zone in mountain time?

            FiyaFlyF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • FiyaFlyF
              FiyaFly @thanksajdotcom
              last edited by

              @thanksaj said:

              @FiyaFly said:

              @thanksaj said:

              @FiyaFly said:

              Here's an interesting one. Every now and again a client sends us an email from Vitelity detailing a call failure. It only ever is one at a time and happens once every couple weeks. Nothing changes in the configuration. This is how the email reads:

              "A call to your DID <removed> from <removed> has failed at 11:02am on 11/05/2014 MDT. We received 'CHANUNAVAIL' when attempting to route the call to your server or device. This number is configured to route to the peer<removed> on the account <removed>

              This error usually means your server or device is not currently registered to our servers. Please make sure you are registered to the correct inbound server for your account as per the configuration samples found on the support page within the user portal and that you have selected the correct routing method for your DID(s) on the DIDs page.
              "

              Any ideas?

              Is the client in Mountain time?

              The PBX is hosted. DFW data center.

              Why is the time zone in mountain time?

              Not entirely sure. The client is either Central or Eastern time, and the server, just double checked, is set to Central. That is how the email was sent.

              FiyaFlyF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • FiyaFlyF
                FiyaFly @FiyaFly
                last edited by

                @FiyaFly said:

                @thanksaj said:

                @FiyaFly said:

                @thanksaj said:

                @FiyaFly said:

                Here's an interesting one. Every now and again a client sends us an email from Vitelity detailing a call failure. It only ever is one at a time and happens once every couple weeks. Nothing changes in the configuration. This is how the email reads:

                "A call to your DID <removed> from <removed> has failed at 11:02am on 11/05/2014 MDT. We received 'CHANUNAVAIL' when attempting to route the call to your server or device. This number is configured to route to the peer<removed> on the account <removed>

                This error usually means your server or device is not currently registered to our servers. Please make sure you are registered to the correct inbound server for your account as per the configuration samples found on the support page within the user portal and that you have selected the correct routing method for your DID(s) on the DIDs page.
                "

                Any ideas?

                Is the client in Mountain time?

                The PBX is hosted. DFW data center.

                Why is the time zone in mountain time?

                Not entirely sure. The client is either Central or Eastern time, and the server, just double checked, is set to Central. That is how the email was sent.

                Aha. MDT=CST

                thanksajdotcomT scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • thanksajdotcomT
                  thanksajdotcom @FiyaFly
                  last edited by

                  @FiyaFly said:

                  @FiyaFly said:

                  @thanksaj said:

                  @FiyaFly said:

                  @thanksaj said:

                  @FiyaFly said:

                  Here's an interesting one. Every now and again a client sends us an email from Vitelity detailing a call failure. It only ever is one at a time and happens once every couple weeks. Nothing changes in the configuration. This is how the email reads:

                  "A call to your DID <removed> from <removed> has failed at 11:02am on 11/05/2014 MDT. We received 'CHANUNAVAIL' when attempting to route the call to your server or device. This number is configured to route to the peer<removed> on the account <removed>

                  This error usually means your server or device is not currently registered to our servers. Please make sure you are registered to the correct inbound server for your account as per the configuration samples found on the support page within the user portal and that you have selected the correct routing method for your DID(s) on the DIDs page.
                  "

                  Any ideas?

                  Is the client in Mountain time?

                  The PBX is hosted. DFW data center.

                  Why is the time zone in mountain time?

                  Not entirely sure. The client is either Central or Eastern time, and the server, just double checked, is set to Central. That is how the email was sent.

                  Aha. MDT=CST

                  Oh, well that's interesting...

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @FiyaFly
                    last edited by

                    @FiyaFly said:

                    Aha. MDT=CST

                    Um, no, that's not what it means. They are unique things.

                    thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • thanksajdotcomT
                      thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @FiyaFly said:

                      Aha. MDT=CST

                      Um, no, that's not what it means. They are unique things.

                      I think that they would technically be the same time, but they definitely aren't equivalent in the setting of a time.

                      FiyaFlyF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • FiyaFlyF
                        FiyaFly @thanksajdotcom
                        last edited by

                        @thanksaj said:

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        @FiyaFly said:

                        Aha. MDT=CST

                        Um, no, that's not what it means. They are unique things.

                        I think that they would technically be the same time, but they definitely aren't equivalent in the setting of a time.

                        Right. They would be the same time, but not the same zone. Is this significantly pertinent to the issue?

                        thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • thanksajdotcomT
                          thanksajdotcom @FiyaFly
                          last edited by

                          @FiyaFly said:

                          @thanksaj said:

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          @FiyaFly said:

                          Aha. MDT=CST

                          Um, no, that's not what it means. They are unique things.

                          I think that they would technically be the same time, but they definitely aren't equivalent in the setting of a time.

                          Right. They would be the same time, but not the same zone. Is this significantly pertinent to the issue?

                          I'm just thinking it's a possibility. Think about what happens if the system time is off on Windows. If it was a major issue, it would probably happen more frequently or all the time, but I'd fix the time zone if it's wrong server-side.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • thanksajdotcomT
                            thanksajdotcom
                            last edited by

                            Question: is it always the same DID? Does it always happen around the same time? Can you get a few examples together and compare notes?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • NetworkNerdN
                              NetworkNerd
                              last edited by

                              Is SAR setup on that PBX? If it is, you could run it and check server resource load around the time of the call to see if there was an issue there. But I would not think that would be it since we're talking one call failure.

                              thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • NetworkNerdN
                                NetworkNerd
                                last edited by

                                This post is deleted!
                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • thanksajdotcomT
                                  thanksajdotcom @NetworkNerd
                                  last edited by

                                  @NetworkNerd said:

                                  Is SAR setup on that PBX? If it is, you could run it and check server resource load around the time of the call to see if there was an issue there. But I would not think that would be it since we're talking one call failure.

                                  The fact it's just one call is what makes me wonder if there is a common DID that is the problem child.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • NetworkNerdN
                                    NetworkNerd
                                    last edited by NetworkNerd

                                    Are there other clients you know of who use Vitelity and have this problem now and then or just the one you mention here? I wonder if it has something to do with the way Vitelity does trunk authentication.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Minion QueenM
                                      Minion Queen Banned
                                      last edited by

                                      We have at least one other client with Vitelity and we use it ourselves with no similar issues.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • thanksajdotcomT
                                        thanksajdotcom
                                        last edited by

                                        I also want to clarify: when you say call failure, failure to dial or call drops in the middle?

                                        NetworkNerdN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • FiyaFlyF
                                          FiyaFly
                                          last edited by

                                          This client has either 1 or 2 DID's. There are two in the system but I am unsure if they use both of them. I have two emails, one from today and one from 10/15. Both to the same DID, at two different times of the day.

                                          Call failure meaning the report from Vitelity in the original post.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • FiyaFlyF
                                            FiyaFly
                                            last edited by

                                            Part of the SAR report:
                                            Time-CPU - %user- %nice- %system- %iowait- %steal- %idle
                                            10:50:01 AM- all - 0.32 - 0.00 - 0.22 - 0.07 - 0.17 - 99.22
                                            11:00:01 AM - all - 0.79 - 0.00 - 0.28 - 0.09 - 0.16 - 98.68
                                            11:10:01 AM - all - 0.70 -0.00 - 0.28 - 0.09 - 0.15 - 98.79
                                            11:20:01 AM - all - 0.56 -0.00- 0.25 - 0.07 - 0.12 - 99.00

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post