What Are You Doing Right Now
-
Just looking at a document for PCI compliance.
• Implementing only one primary function per server to prevent functions that require different security levels from co-existing on the same server?
to me that's a VM per function?
e.g. before seeing this i was about to spin up a new VM that will be a file server (we have reasons for it not being cloud) then also a IIS site, run a password expiring messaging program (this was done by someone else, i'm sure there's a easier Free way of doing it).
But to me that says each of those functions should be on their own VM? -
Building a new domain controller, and coffee - cup # 4
-
About an hour to go.
-
@JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
About an hour to go.
Why are you driving so slowly, is something broken with your vehicle?
-
@hobbit666 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Just looking at a document for PCI compliance.
• Implementing only one primary function per server to prevent functions that require different security levels from co-existing on the same server?
to me that's a VM per function?
e.g. before seeing this i was about to spin up a new VM that will be a file server (we have reasons for it not being cloud) then also a IIS site, run a password expiring messaging program (this was done by someone else, i'm sure there's a easier Free way of doing it).
But to me that says each of those functions should be on their own VM?Yes, that is the preferred way to handle things. Each VM only does a single thing. In this case 1 would be a file server and 1 would be an IIS server (why anyone would choose IIS over all the other faster alternatives I don't know.)
-
@travisdh1 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@hobbit666 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Just looking at a document for PCI compliance.
• Implementing only one primary function per server to prevent functions that require different security levels from co-existing on the same server?
to me that's a VM per function?
e.g. before seeing this i was about to spin up a new VM that will be a file server (we have reasons for it not being cloud) then also a IIS site, run a password expiring messaging program (this was done by someone else, i'm sure there's a easier Free way of doing it).
But to me that says each of those functions should be on their own VM?Yes, that is the preferred way to handle things. Each VM only does a single thing. In this case 1 would be a file server and 1 would be an IIS server (why anyone would choose IIS over all the other faster alternatives I don't know.)
Also why use something so expensive, unless there is a requirement to use Windows.
-
@DustinB3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
About an hour to go.
Why are you driving so slowly, is something broken with your vehicle?
Things in my way. All better now
-
Migrating lab hypervisor from Centos 8 to Centos Stream 8.
-
@travisdh1 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
why anyone would choose IIS over all the other faster alternatives I don't know.
Legacy product, waiting to be replaced (this will be a good excuse to start
)Same for @DustinB3403 all legacy stuff and ways of doing things (some people don't like change)
Slowly trying to move things. -
Installed my first CentOS stream today for a ELK stack
-
Surfing youtube and telegram, after an hour I will buy new godfather movie, hope i`ll enjoy it !
-
@NikoleJennes said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Surfing youtube and telegram, after an hour I will buy new godfather movie, hope i`ll enjoy it !
A new godfather movie?
-
@hobbit666 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Installed my first CentOS stream today for a ELK stack
I'm definitely in the "not deploying any more CentOS" camp now.
-
Well I was building a DC on current 2019, until I saw the one major glaring issue that shouldn't be fucking present. . .. . .
The domain level is over 12 years out of date. . .
-
@DustinB3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Well I was building a DC on current 2019, until I saw the one major glaring issue that shouldn't be fucking present. . .. . .
The domain level is over 12 years out of date. . .
and?
Does 2019 not support DC level 2008? -
@Dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@DustinB3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Well I was building a DC on current 2019, until I saw the one major glaring issue that shouldn't be fucking present. . .. . .
The domain level is over 12 years out of date. . .
and?
Does 2019 not support DC level 2008?It does not, when FSR is used. I'd have to migrate to DFSR from the existing DC first before I can introduce this new server into the environment.
-
@DustinB3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@Dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@DustinB3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Well I was building a DC on current 2019, until I saw the one major glaring issue that shouldn't be fucking present. . .. . .
The domain level is over 12 years out of date. . .
and?
Does 2019 not support DC level 2008?It does not, when FSR is used. I'd have to migrate to DFSR from the existing DC first before I can introduce this new server into the environment.
Where is SAMBA domain level equaliency at today? yep... it's a side question...
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@hobbit666 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Installed my first CentOS stream today for a ELK stack
I'm definitely in the "not deploying any more CentOS" camp now.
Any perticular reason?
If you were spinning one up what would you use? -
@hobbit666 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@hobbit666 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Installed my first CentOS stream today for a ELK stack
I'm definitely in the "not deploying any more CentOS" camp now.
Any perticular reason?
If you were spinning one up what would you use?Ubuntu or SUSE would be my guess.
-
@hobbit666 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@hobbit666 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Installed my first CentOS stream today for a ELK stack
I'm definitely in the "not deploying any more CentOS" camp now.
Any perticular reason?
If you were spinning one up what would you use?And because Redhat has killed the CentOS line, making a just before production ready OS. CentOS Stream is upstream to RedHat, meaning it's where DEV happens, rather than Fedora being the Dev platform (essentially).
