@Dashrender Check this thread
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/955731/who-deleted-an-appointment-from-a-shared-calendar

@scottalanmiller I believe @dave247

@gjacobse said in NextCloud: Chmod user folders:

Oh - no - the syntax is incorrect for ownership.

sudo chown

Yes,

chown to change owner chmod to change mode (permission)

Remember you can always do man chown to see the syntax.

I ran some test on a VM and created some groups and added some top-level directories for those groups.

Changed the group on each top-level directories and files below recursively with chown -R.

Set directories to permission 2770 and files to 0660 with chmod -R.

Changed smb.conf and added create mask=0660 and directory mask=2770.

Now new files and directories created on the share have the right permission and belongs to the right group automatically, simply depending on what group the top-level directory belongs to.

If you're not a member of a group, you will not even see the directories or files that belongs to that group.

I think this is a good interim solution without too much work. Then moving to onedrive or whatever can be done in the future on a department to department basis.

Only admin required for adding users is to add them to linux/samba and make sure they become members of the right groups.

It's also very simple to make a separate share out of the top-level folders if you wanted.

@JaredBusch yeah, it's annoying that WP-CLI struggles with that.

@wrx7m said in Microsoft Windows Default Permissions for Fixed and External Drives:

@black3dynamite said in Microsoft Windows Default Permissions for Fixed and External Drives:

And I noticed that they are different on Servers and Desktops

I had no idea they would be different.

On the server one of the permissions that stands out for me is the CREATOR OWNER (full control / subfolders and files only.
From what I can tell, when a user creates a folder on the root drive, that person will be given the permission of full control of that folder only and then CREATOR OWNER on that folder is also added with full control of subfolders and files only.

But for the desktop, on the root drive you are not given any full control of that folder.

@Pete-S said in Apache installation - file owner & permissions?:

I was wondering what permission and owner should files like html, php etc have?

Normally you just do...

chown www-data:www-data -R /var/www/html

Bit of a necro post, but I'm finally getting back around to NFS review for RHCSA. nfsstat -s tells me I'm using version 4.

@IRJ You are passionate about computers, you love to write code. Well, what's more exciting than being able to create your own plugins.

When you know that WordPress is today one of the most used CMS on the web, it would be really interesting to see how a plugin is made and to be able to create it yourself. [Check it here] (http://bit.ly/2KxPChJ)

@JaredBusch I have a couple clients using Synology for their auth needs and it's been working extremely well.

@momurda FYI I would have selected your post as the answer, but the NodeBB plugin doesn't let you do that.

@black3dynamite said in Snipe-IT php upgrade.php install:

@dustinb3403 said in Snipe-IT php upgrade.php install:

No denials found.

100% done found 0 alerts in /var/log/audit/audit.log

Is apache the owner of snipeit directory, subdirectories, and files?

apache : apache owns at least storage, which is where those files are. (I am a part of this group)

@jrc said in Linux Permission Assignments:

To me a group is a collection of a certain type of user and is then used to streamline permissions to certain resources. EG Instead of giving read permission to Cathy, Joan and Frank, you can just create a group with them in it, and give that group read permission thereby simplifying your job.

I cannot for the life of me think why you would want a single user group with the same name as the user in it. Are there permissions that can only be assigned to a group rather than directly to the user?

What am I missing here?

Setgid creates group specific permissions for files in the directory with setgid turned on.

Having a group id also lets you do things like have root own a file and be able to modify it but let apache and only apache read it.

Edit: I see Romo beat me to it with the links. I didn't read them until just now.

@Danp a distro upgrade would likely be the easier approach. I'm performing this now on my system.

(first day back to work in 11-days!)

Just deleting the contents, its 2 years old, and the user didn't even knew it existed and hasn't accessed it.

Thanks guys.

@scottalanmiller said:

You could, but it would require making lots and lots of shares potentially. As opposed to one or two shares with granular permissions.

Ah ok, makes sense.

@scottalanmiller said:

You are too fast for us 🙂

I had a meeting at 3pm EST with the vendor on the assumption I was going to have the issue fixed by then. Now I can go get some coffee.

This machine is part of our parent company's domain which I am not administering. What I got from their team is it might be due to SEP policies! Even though I disabled SEP on my machine, it still is the same issue. I am member of local admin group as well.

Thanks for the follow up.