Merry Christmas everyone!
Service Providers
People who work for a technology service provider.
Private
Posts
-
Nginx: could not build optimal server_names_hashposted in IT Discussion
Got this error when adding new websites to an Nginx host:
[warn] : could not build optimal server_names_hash, you should increase either server_names_hash_max_size: 512 or server_names_hash_bucket_size: 64; ignoring server_names_hash_bucket_sizeBasically, that warning means nginx has too many / too-long server_name entries now, and the internal hash table it uses to match hostnames is too small. The default config is to keep the hash table quite small.
You don’t need to change any of your site configs — you need to adjust global nginx hash settings.
On Ubuntu, the config file is /etc/nginx/nginx.conf
You should increase one or both of these directives:
• server_names_hash_max_size
• server_names_hash_bucket_sizeThey go in the http {} block, not inside a server {} block.
The following example settings will double the default values and likely allow you to grow for a while. Increase as needed...
http { server_names_hash_max_size 1024; server_names_hash_bucket_size 128; ... } -
RE: Zoho Email Free SMTP Sending Limitsposted in IT Discussion
@dbeato said in Zoho Email Free SMTP Sending Limits:
@scottalanmiller I see, you wanted transparency.
Yes, we have people who use it (without telling us) and then expect us to troubleshoot why "it worked yesterday and today we can't send emails", we had to spend a lot of our resources and Zoho's to get someone to disclose that the system DOES work sometimes (we thought it never worked) but that there are all these reasonable, but secret, limiters on it.
-
RE: Zoho Email Free SMTP Sending Limitsposted in IT Discussion
@dbeato said in Zoho Email Free SMTP Sending Limits:
@scottalanmiller I see, you wanted transparency.
Yes, we have people who use it (without telling us) and then expect us to troubleshoot why "it worked yesterday and today we can't send emails", we had to spend a lot of our resources and Zoho's to get someone to disclose that the system DOES work sometimes (we thought it never worked) but that there are all these reasonable, but secret, limiters on it.
-
RE: UNRAID: Did it improve since 2017?posted in IT Discussion
As they said... UNraid takes something you don't need and makes it seem nice and pretty. But back up and answer.... why would you want something in the CATEGORY of UNraid? You have to have a purpose. Otherwise we're just pointing out its an untrustworthy product that you should never evaluate because of who they are - storage you can't trust. Like TrueNAS, a vendor built on lies and scams is a bad place to be for your storage. When you can't have trust, you can't use as storage.
But before you get to vendor trust, what value would the product potentially have? I've never had a situation where I said "If only I could trust these guys, this would meet my needs." It just doesn't come up. It's a product without a purpose.
-
RE: UNRAID: Did it improve since 2017?posted in IT Discussion
@gjacobse said in UNRAID: Did it improve since 2017?:
Co-worker came
UNraid was a scam. Now they just resell stuff. No value.
-
RE: Zoho Email Free SMTP Sending Limitsposted in IT Discussion
You don't really expect more, I didn't expect it to work at all. But expecting the limits to be published so that you don't have to ask support for something basic like "what am I allowed to do" would be...practical.
-
RE: Step-by-Step Hyper-V Setup for Windows 11posted in Starwind
@Oksana but... why would anyone do this? lol
